{"id":159,"date":"2013-09-10T15:55:00","date_gmt":"2013-09-10T19:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.matthewpratola.com\/?p=159"},"modified":"2018-02-13T18:53:07","modified_gmt":"2018-02-13T23:53:07","slug":"159","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/matthewpratola.com\/2013\/09\/10\/159\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"
I’m just about to submit some of our newest research involving Bayesian regression trees! A really exciting project on MCMC samplers that has enabled us to use this flexible and scaleable regression model approach in challenging uncertainty quantification problems. Update<\/strong>: appears in Bayesian Analysis 11(3) (2016): 885-911. Abstract follows.<\/p>\n Bayesian regression trees are flexible non-parametric models that are well suited to many modern statistical regression problems. Many such tree models have been proposed, from the simple single-tree model to more complex tree ensembles. Their non-parametric formulation allows for effective and efficient modeling of datasets exhibiting complex non-linear relationships between the model predictors and observations. However, the mixing behaviour of the MCMC sampler is sometimes poor. This is because the proposals in the sampler are typically local alterations of the tree structure, such as the birth\/death of leaf nodes, which does not allow for efficient traversal of the model space. This poor mixing can lead to inferential problems, such as under-representing uncertainty. In this paper, we develop novel proposal mechanisms for efficient sampling. The first is a rule perturbation proposal while the second we call tree rotation. The perturbation proposal can be seen as an efficient variation of the change proposal found in existing literature. The novel tree rotation proposal is simple to implement as it only requires local changes to the regression tree structure, yet it efficiently traverses disparate regions of the model space along contours of equal probability. When combined with the classical birth\/death proposal, the resulting MCMC sampler exhibits good acceptance rates and properly represents model uncertainty in the posterior samples. We implement this sampling algorithm in the Bayesian Additive Regression Tree (BART) model and demonstrate its effectiveness on a prediction problem from computer experiments and a test function where structural tree variability is needed to fully explore the posterior.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I’m just about to submit some of our newest research involving Bayesian regression trees! A really exciting project on MCMC samplers that has enabled us to use this flexible and scaleable regression model approach in challenging uncertainty quantification problems. Update: appears in Bayesian Analysis 11(3) (2016): 885-911. Abstract follows. Bayesian regression trees are flexible non-parametric … <\/p>\n\n